BELLEAIR SHORE, Fla. — The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has denied a petition from the Town of Belleair Shore to remove a legal beach boundary that opponents feared could eventually lead to more of the beach becoming private.
The final order, obtained by Tampa Bay 28 after it was forwarded by a Belleair Beach city leader, rejects Belleair Shore's request to cancel and vacate a portion of an erosion control line, or ECL, along the Pinellas County coastline.
The dispute centered on the boundary, which was established as part of a 1997 beach renourishment project. Belleair Shore argued the erosion control line should be removed because the town did not participate in the project.
In its decision, FDEP found the underlying beach renourishment project was completed within the timeframe required by law, which makes the erosion control line ineligible for cancellation.
The department also concluded that Florida law does not allow only a portion of the erosion control line to be vacated.
FDEP further noted that Belleair Shore "received sand from adjacent placements during multiple nourishment events starting in 1998, and as recently as 2018."
Opponents of the petition, including some homeowners and officials in neighboring Belleair Beach, had argued removing the line could eventually strengthen private property claims over portions of the dry sand beach and reduce public access.
Belleair Shore still has the option to challenge FDEP's decision through Florida's administrative appeals process.
Share Your Story with Chad
Chad Mills calls Polk County home and has witnessed the area’s growth firsthand. He is focused on sharing stories from his neighbors in Lakeland. You can use the form below to connect with Chad.
.
'It's either eat or pay bills': Florida families desperate for answers after losing SNAP benefits to fraud
Florida families are losing hundreds of dollars in SNAP benefits to fraud, with multiple victims in the Tampa Bay area saying unauthorized charges on their accounts are being traced to the same California address — and the state is offering no way to get that money back.
